The ruling dismissed an appeal from the PDP and annulled the Ibadan Convention that produced the Turaki-led NWC. The Supreme Court directed Mark to return to the Federal High Court for further hearings on issues arising from this leadership crisis.

INEC updated its website to reflect Mark’s leadership, but he cannot conduct congresses or primaries due to a recent Federal High Court ruling. This ruling voided recent congresses and restrained the ADC from organizing state congresses or national conventions.

The ADC faces several deadlines as it prepares for the upcoming elections:

Parties must submit their membership registers to INEC by May 10, 2026 . and Candidates’ names must be uploaded on the INEC portal by July 11, 2026 .

Dumebi Kachikwu commented on the ruling, stating that it displayed “biblical King Solomon’s wisdom” in avoiding destabilization. However, observers note that this ruling is a temporary legal reprieve amid ongoing challenges.

Mark’s leadership is recognized by INEC, but significant hurdles remain for the ADC as it seeks to participate effectively in the 2027 elections. The next steps involve appealing the Federal High Court ruling to regain full operational capabilities.

The post Adc supreme court ruling appeared first on Toprecruitment.

The conflict began when Nafiu Bala Gombe sought a court order to prevent INEC from recognizing David Mark and Rauf Aregbesola as national chairman and secretary of the ADC. The Court of Appeal had initially directed that the status quo ante bellum be maintained, which resulted in INEC derecognizing Mark’s leadership.

Justice Mohammed Garba delivered the unanimous judgment from a five-member panel. The Supreme Court ruled that the Court of Appeal lacked authority to issue a preservative order while the case was still pending before the trial court. The ruling directed all parties to return to the Federal High Court for an expeditious hearing.

The ADC’s national spokesman, Bolaji Abdullahi, welcomed the verdict, describing it as a clear affirmation of the party’s legitimacy. He stated, “We commend the five-man panel of the Supreme Court, whose unanimous judgment has today done great credit to the judiciary in our country and our political system.”

Legal expert Jubrin Okutekpa noted that INEC’s prior actions to remove David Mark and his executive committee have now been invalidated. He remarked, “Di basis upon which Inec bin act to remove di name of Senator (David) Mark and im exco don dey removed…” This ruling is expected to have far-reaching effects on the upcoming 2027 general elections.

As political dynamics shift within Nigeria, this ruling reinstates stability in ADC leadership ahead of critical electoral contests. Officials have yet to confirm how this will influence party strategies moving forward.

The post Adc supreme court appeared first on Toprecruitment.

The Supreme Court has fixed April 14 for the hearing of Mark’s appeal against Nafiu Bala’s suit, which questions Mark’s leadership position. Mark’s appeal is marked SC/CV/180/2026, and he is seeking to overturn the Court of Appeal’s decision that deemed his case as incompetent and unmeritorious.

On March 12, 2026, the Court of Appeal ruled against Mark, a decision that has significant implications for the ADC’s internal dynamics. Following this ruling, on April 1, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) announced it would no longer recognize the factions of the ADC led by either Mark or Bala, further complicating the leadership crisis.

In response to INEC’s announcement, Mark filed a motion requesting the court to compel INEC to restore their names and recognize them as members of the party’s national working committee. This legal maneuver highlights the urgency and complexity of the situation as both factions vie for legitimacy.

The Supreme Court has also scheduled a hearing for April 22 in another related appeal filed by Mark regarding the leadership dispute in the ADC. A five-member panel of the Supreme Court, led by Justice Mohammed Garba, granted accelerated hearing in this matter, indicating the court’s recognition of the case’s significance.

In a separate ruling, the Supreme Court set aside the judgment of the Court of Appeal concerning the appointment of counsel for Nestoil and Neconde, affirming that these entities remain valid legal entities with the right to engage counsel of their choice. This ruling may set a precedent for how legal disputes are handled within corporate governance and political party structures.

As the April 14 hearing approaches, the ADC’s leadership crisis continues to unfold, with both Mark and Bala preparing for what could be a pivotal moment for the party. The outcome of this appeal could determine the future of the ADC and its leadership structure, which has been under scrutiny since the initial suit was filed by Bala on September 2, 2025, to restrain INEC from recognizing Mark-led executives.

Details remain unconfirmed regarding the potential implications of the Supreme Court’s decisions on the ADC’s internal politics and its recognition by INEC. The political landscape may shift dramatically depending on the court’s rulings in the coming weeks, particularly as the parties involved await the Supreme Court’s judgment.

The post Supreme Court to Hear Appeal by David Mark on April 14 appeared first on Toprecruitment.

The Federal Government of Nigeria has proposed an allocation of N135.22 billion in the 2026 budget specifically for electoral adjudication and post-election matters. This allocation, which is part of the 2026 Appropriation Bill, falls under the Service-Wide Votes and represents approximately 3.65% of the total Consolidated Revenue Fund charges, which amount to N3.70 trillion.

The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has projected a requirement of N873.78 billion to conduct the 2027 general elections. Additionally, INEC has requested N171 billion for its operations in the 2026 fiscal year. The N135.22 billion allocated for electoral adjudication is a new line item not previously stated in the proposed budget, raising eyebrows among political observers.

The allocation for INEC represents 21% of the total statutory transfers of N4.80 trillion. Critics have voiced concerns regarding the implications of this allocation, with opposition parties and civil society organizations expressing skepticism about the government’s intentions. Human rights lawyer Femi Falana described the proposed expenditure as “on the very high side” and criticized it as excessive and unjustifiable.

Anthony Ubani of #FixPolitics Africa commented on the allocation, stating, “The N135.22bn allocation for post-election legal battles is a troubling signal about the state of our democracy.” This sentiment reflects a growing concern over the integrity of Nigeria’s electoral system, which has faced numerous challenges in recent years.

Further criticism came from political analyst Prof Pat Utomi, who questioned the rationale behind the Federal Government’s budget for electoral processes, stating, “It is not the Federal Government that goes to elections, it is the individual candidates, so why should the Federal Government have a budget for it?” Such remarks highlight the ongoing debate about the role of government funding in elections and the potential influence it may have on electoral outcomes.

The allocation for electoral adjudication and post-election matters indicates ongoing fiscal pressure from election-related legal disputes in Nigeria. Observers note that this funding could be a response to the increasing number of legal challenges that arise following elections, which have become a common feature of Nigeria’s political landscape.

In a broader context, Japan has enacted its largest fiscal budget in history worth ¥122.3 trillion (€664 billion) for 2026, which was approved in the upper house of parliament after an emergency stopgap budget was enacted on March 30, 2026. While the scale of Japan’s budget dwarfs Nigeria’s, it underscores the varying approaches to fiscal policy in different nations.

As Nigeria moves closer to the 2027 general elections, the implications of the proposed budget allocation for electoral adjudication remain to be seen. Observers expect that the allocation will continue to draw scrutiny and debate, particularly regarding its impact on the electoral process and the overall health of Nigeria’s democracy. Details remain unconfirmed regarding how these funds will be utilized and whether they will effectively address the concerns raised by critics.

The post Budget: Nigeria’s 2026 Allocates N135.22 Billion for Electoral Adjudication appeared first on Toprecruitment.

The African Democratic Congress (ADC) has engaged the US lobbying firm Von Batten-Montague-York L.C. to assist with issues related to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC). This decision comes in the wake of INEC’s recent announcement that it has withdrawn recognition of the ADC leadership led by David Mark and Rauf Aregbesola due to a court ruling.

On April 1, 2026, INEC declared it would not engage with the ADC, citing ongoing legal issues as the primary reason. This development has raised concerns about the ADC’s ability to participate in the democratic process, particularly as the party prepares for the upcoming 2027 General election.

Sule Lamido, a prominent figure in Nigerian politics, criticized politicians aligning with the ADC, labeling them as “politically displaced.” Meanwhile, Felix Morka, a spokesperson for the All Progressives Congress (APC), dismissed the ADC coalition’s influence, stating, “Fear a party that is a non-starter? Fear a party that is almost as good as non-existent?”

Morka further referred to key figures in the ADC as “twinkle, twinkle, little stars” with no substantial impact on the political landscape. This sentiment reflects a broader skepticism regarding the ADC’s viability as a political force.

Despite INEC’s derecognition of its leadership, the ADC plans to hold its Congress, asserting its commitment to the electoral process. The party has rejected INEC’s decision to remove its leadership from the electoral commission’s portal, indicating a determination to contest the ruling.

The lobbying firm Von Batten-Montague-York L.C. has stated that it represents foreign governments and international entities, not local US entities. This has raised questions about the ADC’s strategy and the implications of foreign involvement in its political maneuvers.

As the ADC navigates these challenges, it faces internal criticisms regarding its leadership crisis, which Morka attributes to internal failings. The party’s future remains uncertain, with observers closely watching how these developments will affect its participation in the upcoming elections.

Details remain unconfirmed regarding the ADC’s next steps and the potential impact of its lobbying efforts on its standing with INEC and the broader electoral landscape.

The post African Democratic Congress Faces Leadership Crisis Amid INEC Challenges appeared first on Toprecruitment.

What does the recent lobbying deal signed by Atiku Abubakar signify for his political future and the state of Nigerian democracy? The $1.2 million contract with the lobbying firm Von Batten-Montague-York, L.C. aims to enhance Abubakar’s public image and influence in the United States, particularly as he prepares for the upcoming presidential election in 2027.

The contract was executed on March 9 and 10, 2026, and is set to last for 12 months, with payments made in six installments. The lobbying firm has outlined plans to counteract the narratives pushed by the Nigerian government, which has been critical of Abubakar and his party, the African Democratic Congress (ADC).

In a statement, the firm expressed concerns regarding the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), which announced on April 1, 2026, that it would not recognize the ADC’s leadership. This decision has effectively frozen Nigeria’s main opposition party, raising alarms about the integrity of the electoral process in Nigeria.

“At best dis na careless reporting. At worst, na a coordinated narrative designed to distort facts to push current Nigerian govment political interests,” said a representative from Von Batten-Montague-York, L.C., highlighting the contentious political landscape.

Political analysts have also weighed in, with one stating, “Dis na complete joke,” reflecting the skepticism surrounding the ADC’s ability to navigate these challenges. The ADC is currently facing internal disputes following INEC’s derecognition of its factions, complicating its position ahead of the elections.

The lobbying firm plans to arrange meetings between Abubakar and key U.S. officials, including members of Congress, to discuss these issues. They aim to engage U.S. authorities regarding INEC’s actions, which they believe threaten the democratic process in Nigeria.

As the situation unfolds, the ADC’s ability to participate effectively in the democratic process remains uncertain. The firm has indicated that they will present their concerns to members of the United States Congress and the current administration.

The political environment in Nigeria is increasingly fraught, with many politicians defecting to the ADC as they prepare for the 2027 General election. This lobbying effort may be crucial for Abubakar as he seeks to solidify his position in the face of mounting challenges.

Details remain unconfirmed regarding the full impact of this lobbying deal on the ADC’s future and its ability to engage in the electoral process effectively.

The post Lobbying Efforts by Atiku Abubakar Amid Political Turmoil appeared first on Toprecruitment.

In a significant development regarding election law in Nigeria, the Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) has filed a lawsuit against the Code of Conduct Bureau (CCB) for allegedly failing to investigate claims of electoral law abuse. This lawsuit, submitted on April 6, 2026, seeks to compel the CCB to look into allegations surrounding the improper removal of electronic transmission provisions from the recently amended Electoral Act.

The Electoral Act (Amendment) Bill 2026 was passed by both chambers of the National Assembly in February 2026 and subsequently signed into law by President Bola Tinubu. Notably, Clause 60 of the new law makes the electronic transmission of results optional, a change that has raised concerns among various stakeholders.

Additionally, the amended law introduces new requirements for candidates in the upcoming 2027 elections. As many as 50% of candidates may face disqualification due to new tax compliance requirements, which mandate a Tax Clearance Certificate (TCC) linked to the candidate’s National Identification Number (NIN) and company registration number.

The Nigeria Revenue Service has launched an Integrated Tax Compliance Portal (ITCP) to facilitate the automated verification of TCCs, further complicating the electoral landscape. The Electoral Act also maintains strict 14-day deadlines for pre-election challenges, which could impact the ability of candidates to contest their disqualifications.

Critics argue that the new law disproportionately targets individuals outside the current power structure. An anonymous member of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) described the situation as “not transparency; this is a political purge disguised as tax administration.” Meanwhile, Chief Aiyenale Fred Jimoh emphasized that “the era of the politically powerful who operate outside the fiscal system is over.”

Senator Kawu Sumaila remarked, “If you aspire to manage a nation’s resources, you must first demonstrate you are a responsible contributor to those resources,” highlighting the government’s stance on tax compliance as a prerequisite for political participation.

These developments come in the wake of a legislative process that saw alterations to bill provisions without adequate debate or due process, raising questions about the integrity of the electoral framework. The implications of these changes will likely be felt in the upcoming elections, as candidates and parties navigate the new legal landscape.

As the situation unfolds, reactions from various political entities and civil society organizations are expected to shape the discourse surrounding election law in Nigeria. The lawsuit filed by SERAP may serve as a pivotal moment in addressing concerns over electoral integrity and accountability.

The post Election Law Developments in Nigeria: SERAP Files Lawsuit Against CCB appeared first on Toprecruitment.

The Janazah prayer for Hadiza Jega is scheduled to take place immediately after Zuhr at the National Mosque in Abuja on April 5, 2026, at 1:30 p.m.

Attahiru Jega, who served as INEC chairman from 2010 to 2015, was previously the Vice-Chancellor of Bayero University, Kano. He and Hadiza were married for 40 years, a union that has been described as one marked by deep affection and mutual respect.

In a statement, Bayero University Kano expressed their condolences, stating, “Inna lillahi wa inna ilaihi raji’un. With total submission to the will of Allah, we announce the passing of Hajiya Hadiza Attahiru Jega.” They further prayed, “May Allah grant her Aljannatul Firdaus and forgive her shortcomings. May He also grant the family the strength and patience to bear this loss. Ameen.”

President Bola Tinubu also expressed his condolences, highlighting Hadiza Jega’s exceptional character. He remarked, “Dear Professor Jega, it is with a heavy heart that I receive the news of the passing of your beloved wife of over 40 years. Hajiya was an exceptional woman.”

Vice-President Kashim Shettima attended the Janazah prayer, reflecting the significant impact Hadiza Jega had on those around her. Observers note that her legacy will continue through the lives she touched during her lifetime.

As the community mourns her passing, many are expected to gather at the National Mosque to pay their respects and support the Jega family during this difficult time.

The post Attahiru Jega appeared first on Toprecruitment.

“General Sani Abacha, once presumed face of oppression, will be remembered as seemingly more democratic and more respectful of human rights than the so-called champions of activism from the NADECO days,” stated Peter Obi, igniting a fierce debate within Nigeria’s political arena.

Obi’s comments, made in a recent statement, have drawn significant backlash from various political figures, particularly from Femi Fani-Kayode. Fani-Kayode condemned Obi’s remarks, calling them offensive to the memory of those who fought against military dictatorship, stating, “You have totally and completely lost your mind and this post of yours will go down in infamy as the most consequential one you ever made.”

Fani-Kayode further warned that such comments could jeopardize Obi’s aspirations for the presidency, emphasizing the sensitivity surrounding Nigeria’s pro-democracy struggle. Kayode Oladele also criticized Obi, labeling his statement as naive and reckless, claiming it distorts Nigeria’s democratic history.

The controversy erupted following the Independent National Electoral Commission’s (INEC) recent derecognition of certain leaders within the African Democratic Congress (ADC), a move that has heightened tensions in the political landscape.

Members of the National Democratic Coalition (NADECO) are remembered for their sacrifices during the pro-democracy struggle that followed the annulment of the June 12, 1993 presidential election. Their efforts were pivotal in restoring democracy in Nigeria after years of military rule.

Obi’s remarks have sparked outrage, with many arguing that they undermine the sacrifices made by pro-democracy activists. “To mock the memory of those that died fighting for democracy in the June 12 struggle and sacrificed their lives and liberty as members of NADECO in this way is unacceptable and unforgivable,” Fani-Kayode asserted.

Critics have pointed out that the Abacha regime was characterized by repression and a blatant disregard for human rights, making any comparison to democratic values highly contentious.

As the political discourse continues, the implications of Obi’s statements remain to be seen, with many anticipating further developments in the ongoing dialogue surrounding Nigeria’s democratic history.

Details remain unconfirmed.

The post NADECO Controversy: Peter Obi’s Remarks on Sani Abacha Spark Backlash appeared first on Toprecruitment.

Before the recent developments, the African Democratic Congress (ADC) was embroiled in a leadership crisis that began in 2025, following the emergence of a new National Working Committee led by David Mark in July 2025. The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) had been recognizing various factions within the ADC, which was expected to foster internal democracy and allow for a resolution of leadership disputes.

However, a decisive moment occurred when INEC halted recognition of these rival factions pending a resolution of the ongoing leadership dispute. This action was taken in response to a directive from the Court of Appeal, which instructed all parties to maintain the status quo ante bellum, although it did not clarify what that status quo entailed.

The immediate effects of INEC’s decision were significant. Key figures within the ADC, including Ralph Nwosu and others, found their names removed from INEC’s official portal, citing the court order. This led to accusations from David Mark, who claimed that the ruling All Progressives Congress was using INEC to weaken opposition parties ahead of the 2027 general elections.

Oluwole Osaze-Uzzi, a prominent figure in the ADC, challenged INEC’s interpretation of the court order, stating, “The court did not say that INEC should withdraw recognition from either faction. It never did say so.” This highlights the ambiguity surrounding the court’s directive and raises questions about the future of the ADC.

The Nigeria Civil Society Situation Room condemned INEC’s actions, warning that they could undermine internal party democracy. They stated, “The invocation of status quo ante bellum in this instance risks entrenching ambiguity and sustaining contested authority within the ADC.” This perspective underscores the potential long-term implications of INEC’s decision.

As tensions rise, the ADC faces uncertainty regarding its internal structure and the upcoming elections. David Mark has expressed concerns that the current situation is designed to create a political landscape where President Bola Ahmed Tinubu emerges as the only viable option for the electorate in 2027.

Details remain unconfirmed regarding the exact definition of the status quo ante bellum as interpreted by the court, and the implications of INEC’s actions on the ADC’s internal democracy remain uncertain. The political landscape in Nigeria continues to evolve, with the ADC at a critical juncture.

The post Status quo ante bellum appeared first on Toprecruitment.