How it unfolded
In March 2026, Elon Musk’s ambitious plans to expand Starlink’s satellite internet services to Namibia faced a significant setback. Just before the key development, local authorities were reviewing Starlink’s application for a telecommunications service license, which was crucial for the company’s operations in the region.
On March 23, 2026, the Communications Regulatory Authority of Namibia (CRAN) officially declined Starlink’s application. The decision was confirmed by CRAN spokesperson Mufaro Nesongano, who stated, “The authority resolved to ‘decline the award of a class comprehensive telecommunications service license for Starlink Internet Services Namibia (Pty) Limited.’” This rejection was primarily due to the requirement for at least 51 percent local ownership for telecom operators in Namibia, a regulation that Starlink did not meet, as its local subsidiary had zero percent Namibian ownership.
The implications of this decision extend beyond Namibia. Starlink has also faced similar rejections in several other African countries, including South Africa, Tanzania, and the Democratic Republic of Congo. These setbacks underscore the challenges that foreign telecommunications companies encounter when trying to enter markets with stringent local ownership laws.
The Namibian Government Gazette dated March 23, 2026, cited the resolution to decline Starlink’s application, further solidifying the regulatory barriers that Musk’s company must navigate. Local observers have criticized these outdated laws, suggesting they hinder progress in telecommunications and limit the potential for improved internet access in the region.
Elon Musk’s attempts to start providing direct to satellite internet services in Namibia have been thwarted by local authorities, raising questions about the future of Starlink’s expansion plans in Africa. The regulatory landscape in Namibia and similar countries may require significant adjustments to accommodate foreign investment and innovation in telecommunications.
As of now, the situation remains unresolved, with no clear path forward for Starlink in Namibia. The specific reasons for the rejection of Starlink’s application were not clarified by CRAN officials, leaving details unconfirmed. This uncertainty adds to the complexity of the regulatory environment for foreign companies looking to establish a foothold in the African telecommunications market.
In summary, the denial of Starlink’s application in Namibia illustrates the broader challenges faced by international telecommunications firms in navigating local regulations. The outcome of this situation is likely to have implications for both Starlink’s future operations and the overall telecommunications landscape in Namibia and beyond.